False vacuum

False vacuum - hypothetical vacuum, less stable than true vacuum. Article “False vacuum” in English Wikipedia has 76.8 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 79 references and 15 sections.

In this language version of Wikipedia the article has the best quality. Also, this article is the most popular in that (English) language version.

In June 2025 the article “False vacuum” was edited by 4 authors in English Wikipedia and written by 6 authors in all languages.

Since the creation of article “False vacuum”, its content was written by 279 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 433 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 321 times in English Wikipedia and cited 697 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

• Local (English): #8719 in June 2020
• Global: #42342 in June 2020

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

• Local (English): #7743 in April 2015
• Global: #21760 in April 2015

There are 18 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

#	Language	Quality grade	Quality score
1	English (en) False vacuum		76.8079
2	Portuguese (pt) Vácuo falso		60.5429
3	Korean (ko) 거짓 진공 붕괴		54.2876
4	Japanese (ja) 偽の真空		30.2914
5	Chinese (zh) 假真空衰变		26.2135
6	Estonian (et) Valevaakum		25.253
7	Russian (ru) Ложный вакуум		24.3582
8	Romanian (ro) Vid fals		24.2346
9	Persian (fa) خلاء کاذب		23.6914
10	Ukrainian (uk) Хибний вакуум		21.7341

More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

The most popular language versions of the article "False vacuum" in all the time

#	Language	Popularity award	Relative popularity
1	English (en) False vacuum		3 359 981
2	Japanese (ja) 偽の真空		323 840
3	Russian (ru) Ложный вакуум		257 232
4	Spanish (es) Falso vacío		123 248
5	Polish (pl) Fałszywa próżnia		118 714
6	Italian (it) Falso vuoto		81 802
7	French (fr) Faux vide		52 235
8	Chinese (zh) 假真空衰变		22 735
9	Simple English (simple) False vacuum		14 408
10	Korean (ko) 거짓 진공 붕괴		6 255

More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

The most popular language versions of the article "False vacuum" in June 2025

#	Language	Popularity award	Relative popularity
1	English (en) False vacuum		14 803
2	Japanese (ja) 偽の真空		2 148
3	Russian (ru) Ложный вакуум		1 623
4	Simple English (simple) False vacuum		788
5	Chinese (zh) 假真空衰变		408
6	Spanish (es) Falso vacío		357
7	Polish (pl) Fałszywa próżnia		296
8	French (fr) Faux vide		279
9	Italian (it) Falso vuoto		273
10	Korean (ko) 거짓 진공 붕괴		218

More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

Language versions of the article "False vacuum" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.

#	Language	AI award	Relative AI
1	English (en) False vacuum		279
2	Italian (it) Falso vuoto		32
3	Polish (pl) Fałszywa próżnia		27
4	Russian (ru) Ложный вакуум		22
5	Japanese (ja) 偽の真空		17
6	Spanish (es) Falso vacío		13
7	French (fr) Faux vide		12
8	Simple English (simple) False vacuum		7
9	Arabic (ar) تحلل الفراغ الكاذب		4
10	Chinese (zh) 假真空衰变		4

More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

Language versions of the article "False vacuum" with the highest AI in June 2025

#	Language	AI award	Relative AI
1	English (en) False vacuum		4
2	Italian (it) Falso vuoto		1
3	Chinese (zh) 假真空衰变		1
4	Arabic (ar) تحلل الفراغ الكاذب		0
5	Belarusian (be) Несапраўдны вакуум		0
6	Spanish (es) Falso vacío		0
7	Estonian (et) Valevaakum		0
8	Persian (fa) خلاء کاذب		0
9	French (fr) Faux vide		0
10	Indonesian (id) Vakum palsu		0

More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

Language versions of the article "False vacuum" with the highest Citation Index (CI)

#	Language	CI award	Relative CI
1	English (en) False vacuum		321
2	Chinese (zh) 假真空衰变		102
3	Russian (ru) Ложный вакуум		80
4	Romanian (ro) Vid fals		61
5	Italian (it) Falso vuoto		22
6	Japanese (ja) 偽の真空		22
7	Spanish (es) Falso vacío		14
8	French (fr) Faux vide		14
9	Korean (ko) 거짓 진공 붕괴		12
10	Portuguese (pt) Vácuo falso		11

More...

#	Language	Value
ar	Arabic تحلل الفراغ الكاذب
be	Belarusian Несапраўдны вакуум
en	English False vacuum
es	Spanish Falso vacío
et	Estonian Valevaakum
fa	Persian خلاء کاذب
fr	French Faux vide
id	Indonesian Vakum palsu
it	Italian Falso vuoto
ja	Japanese 偽の真空
ko	Korean 거짓 진공 붕괴
pl	Polish Fałszywa próżnia
pt	Portuguese Vácuo falso
ro	Romanian Vid fals
ru	Russian Ложный вакуум
simple	Simple English False vacuum
uk	Ukrainian Хибний вакуум
zh	Chinese 假真空衰变

Best Rank

English: #7743 04.2015

Global: #21760 04.2015

Best Rank

English: #8719 06.2020

Global: #42342 06.2020

On 15 February 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Jeffrey Epstein, Wuthering Heights, 2026 Winter Olympics, Epstein files, Ilia Malinin, Wuthering Heights, Ghislaine Maxwell, Lucas Pinheiro Braathen, 2026 Winter Olympics medal table, Valentine's Day.

In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Jeffrey Epstein, Wuthering Heights, Wuthering Heights (2026 film), 2026 Winter Olympics, Lucas Pinheiro Braathen, Ice hockey at the 2026 Winter Olympics – Men's tournament, Epstein files, John F. Kennedy Jr., Anthony Kim, James Van Der Beek.

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information